Learning How to Walk

February 27th, 2009
Jasmine Stone asked:


Exercise is essentially important to the health of the infant. Its first exercise, of course, will be in the nurse’s arms. After a month or two, when it begins to sleep less during the day, it will delight to roll and kick about on the sofa: it will thus use its limbs freely; and this, with carrying out into the open air, is all the exercise it requires at this period. By and by, however, the child will make its first attempts to walk. Now it is important that none of the many plans which have been devised to teach a child to walk, should be adopted the go-cart, leading-strings, etc.; their tendency is mischievous; and flatness of the chest, confined lungs, distorted spine, and deformed legs, are so many evils which often originate in such practices. This is explained by the fact of the bones in infancy being comparatively soft and pliable, and if prematurely subjected by these contrivances to carry the weight of the body, they yield just like an elastic stick bending under a weight, and as a natural consequence become curved and distorted.

It is highly necessary that the young and experienced mother should recollect this fact, for the early efforts of the little one to walk are naturally viewed by her with so much delight, that she will be apt to encourage and prolong its attempts, without any thought of the mischief which they may occasion; thus many a parent has had to mourn over the deformity which she has herself created.

It may be as well here to remark, that if such distortion is timely noticed, it is capable of correction, even after evident curvature has taken place. It is to be remedied by using those means that shall invigorate the frame, and promote the child’s general health (a daily plunge into the cold bath, or sponging with cold salt water, will be found signally efficacious), and by avoiding the original cause of the distortion never allowing the child to get upon his feet. The only way to accomplish the latter intention, is to put both the legs into a large stocking; this will effectually answer this purpose, while, at the same time, it does not prevent the free and full exercise of the muscles of the legs. After some months pursuing this plan, the limbs will be found no longer deformed, the bones to have acquired firmness and the muscles strength; and the child may be permitted to get upon his feet again without any hazard of perpetuating or renewing the evil.

The best mode of teaching a child to walk, is to let it teach itself, and this it will do readily enough. It will first crawl about: this exercises every muscle in the body, does not fatigue the child, throws no weight upon the bones, but imparts vigour and strength, and is thus highly useful. After a while, having the power, it will wish to do more: it will endeavour to lift itself upon its feet by the aid of a chair, and though it fail again and again in its attempts, it will still persevere until it accomplish it. By this it learns, first, to raise itself from the floor; and secondly, to stand, but not without keeping hold of the object on which it has seized. Next it will balance itself without holding, and will proudly and laughingly show that it can stand alone. Fearful, however, as yet of moving its limbs without support, it will seize a chair or anything else near it, when it will dare to advance as far as the limits of its support will permit. This little adventure will be repeated day after day with increased exultation; when, after numerous trials, he will feel confident of his power to balance himself, and he will run alone. Now time is required for this gradual self-teaching, during which the muscles and bones become strengthened; and when at last called upon to sustain the weight of the body, are fully capable of doing so.

Exercise during childhood

————————-

When the child has acquired sufficient strength to take active exercise, he can scarcely be too much in the open air; the more he is habituated to this, the more capable will he be of bearing the vicissitudes of the climate. Children, too, should always be allowed to amuse themselves at pleasure, for they will generally take that kind and degree of exercise which is best calculated to promote the growth and development of the body. In the unrestrained indulgence of their youthful sports, every muscle of the body comes in for its share of active exercise; and free growth, vigour, and health are the result.

If, however, a child is delicate and strumous, and too feeble to take sufficient exercise on foot, and to such a constitution the respiration of a pure air and exercise are indispensable for the improvement of health, and without them all other efforts will fail, riding on a donkey or pony forms the best substitute. This kind of exercise will always be found of infinite service to delicate children; it amuses the mind, and exercises the muscles of the whole body, and yet in so gentle a manner as to induce little fatigue.

The exercises of horseback, however, are most particularly useful where there is a tendency in the constitution to pulmonary consumption, either from hereditary or accidental causes. It is here beneficial, as well through its influence on the general health, as more directly on the lungs themselves. There can be no doubt that the lungs, like the muscles of the body, acquire power and health of function by exercise. Now during a ride this is obtained, and without much fatigue to the body. The free and equable expansion of the lungs by full inspiration, necessarily takes place; this maintains their healthy structure, by keeping all the air-passages open and pervious; it prevents congestion in the pulmonary circulation, and at the same time provides more completely for the necessary chemical action on the blood, by changing, at each act of respiration, a sufficient proportion of the whole air contained in the lungs, all objects of great importance, and all capable of being promoted, more or less, by the means in question.



Julia

Local Review Social Network, Trusted Places, Rolls Out Iphone Application

February 13th, 2009
Walid Al Saqqaf asked:


Discovering and sharing interesting places now on the iPhone

London, 12 November 2007: TrustedPlaces, the unique online community for discovering and sharing reviews of places to socialise, has launched an optimised version of its website for the iPhone to coincide with its launch in the UK. iPhone owners are now able to discover user generated reviews of thousands of restaurants, bars, cafés, pubs and much more, by going to trustedplaces.com/iphone.

The TrustedPlaces iPhone application is fully integrated to the iPhone’s capability. Clicking on any phone number on a webpage activates a call, whereas clicking on a place’s address details brings up its location on Google Maps. The user can ask for directions and if they’re planning a meet-up they can email all the details for a place using iPhone, in-built email capability. Co-founder, and COO, Walid Al Saqqaf said: "The iPhone is a fantastic device that will have a big impact on how people access the web from their phone. With the TrustedPlaces application users now have an easy way to discover all the recommendations from their peers, not just when they are by their computers, but on the move as well. It is a natural extension to TrustedPlaces.com and we’re very excited about its evolution."

"With the iPhone finding great places to dine or socialize has never been easier. The TrustedPlaces App. makes the best use of the iPhone’s capability to discovering some of the best rated restaurants, bars and pubs in your area by real people."

The application uses the TrustedPlaces API (Application Programming Interface), which is currently under closed beta, and was conceived and developed by Brighton-based software house Builtbydave, the brainchild of David Stone. The API allows for two way sharing of all TrustedPlaces content and the company is actively looking for partners to participate in its Syndication Partner programme.

About TrustedPlaces

With reviews from over 450 cities in 40 countries, TrustedPlaces allows people to discover and share online all the latest information on where to go out, via reviews and recommendations, from the TrustedPlaces community of passionate and engaged individual reviewers.

With unique content continuously refreshed by its members, TrustedPlaces aims to become the UK’s largest online resource for independent reviews for lifestyle places. In July The Guardian listed the company as one of the ‘Top 10 dotcoms to watch’ recognising the growth and potential of the location-focused social network. Founded in 2006 by Sokratis Papafloratos and Walid Al Saqqaf in London, UK, the beta site launched in February 2007 when TrustedPlaces also secured £500k funding from HOWZAT Media.

For more information visit www.trustedplaces.com

To see TrustedPlaces on the iPhone visit www.trustedplaces.com/iphone

Read our blog at: http://trustedplaces.com/blog

Contacts:

Sokratis Papafloratos

CEO & Co-founder

sokratis@trustedplaces.com

+44 (0)7717 307032

Walid Al Saqqaf

COO & Co-founder

walid@trustedplaces.com

+44 (0)7971 886260



Ana

Stone Knobs - A Fine Option For Installing On Your Cabinets

February 3rd, 2009
Jesse Akre asked:


Long before we were able to manage metal came the Stone Age. We have been fascinated by stones ever since. We have used them as tools. The first ones were just large rocks that were used to bash things open for dinner.

Then, we realized there could be more to stone than the shape it came in and started creating new item, like knives and other tools for working. Somewhere along the way someone also figured out the correct rocks to click together to start a fire.

Even thought times have changed, and we went through other stages, like the Bronze Age, we are always drawn to stone. Things made of stone connect us with our beginning, are from the earth, and many want to have a part of that natural beauty that Mother Nature has given. One way to do this is to add stone knobs to your home.

Modern materials and manufacturing never seem to really measure up to stone knobs. Just the cool feel of a stone knob against your flesh, makes a door stand out. It has a much more substantial and earthy feel than a brushed aluminum or other more modern knob. Once you touch it your hand will notice the difference of stone knobs. The organic feel will strike a cord and may even make you stop and take a look at the creation.

There are quite a few styles of stone knobs that are available on the market. Some of them have been completely tooled and shaped to feel perfectly smooth and rounded like a molded door knob. These stone knobs can be made out of a variety of stones, but granite and other easy find stones are the most popular. You can even find stone knobs that have been tooled out of marble, but these can ding and scratch more over time. Yet, it almost seems appropriate that the same stone that great artists like Michelangelo used to create masterpieces can be turned into the stone knobs in your home.

The next type of stone knobs are the designer knobs. They are made of semi-precious and precious stones. Some of these knobs mix metal and stone and are literally a masterpiece with designs created out of the various gemstone pieces.

If you are working on a very rustic home theme, you need something completely different. You need stone knobs that look as if they were just picked up off the path by the creek. Lucky for you, those are available. There are many specialty stone knobs that really are made out of the stones that were found on a creek bed. If you are going for a specific look, you can even hunt for the natural stones that are from a particular region or body of water.

Stone knobs are a connection with our cave men ancestors, although they never went this far with their stone tools. They were busy rolling large things in front of a door to block their homes from intrusion. What if they had a knob, to make their lives a little easier?



Philip

The Night on Which Lennon Was Killed

January 29th, 2009
Gianni Truvianni asked:


For me it was a Monday night like any other, on which I vividly recall being home watching a football game (of the American variety) on ABC’s Monday Night Football between the Miami Dolphins and the New England Patriots and though I do not remember the exact time I know it must have been close to midnight on the 8th of December, 1980. This given the fact that the game was late in to the 4th quarter with the Patriots winning by seven points though the Dolphins, lead by their young quarterback Woodley were heading for what would be a touchdown to send the game in to overtime. It was while the Dolphins were driving up field late in the 4th quarter that Howard Cossell, announced that John Lennon, a name which in all frankness I had never even heard of till that moment; me being 13 at time had been shot while leaving his apartment building, “The Dakota”. The Dakota being a building located on the Westside of Central Park on 72nd Street in Manhattan and not far from where I was living at the time with my mother between 81st and 82nd street on Lexington avenue. 

I at the time had no idea who John Lennon was though it was announced that he had been a member of a band which had been known as “The Beatles”. This a name which I had often heard but never taken any particular interest in along with many other names such as “The Rolling Stones” or “The Who” or “Led Zeppelin”. I Naturally at the time wished that this man’s life could be saved as I would have done so concerning anybody’s life regardless of weather they were famous or otherwise.

I however checked with my grandmother, who was in New York and staying with us at the time if she knew who Lennon was, for above all I knew my grandmother to be a classical music fan and not much of one when it came to pop music or rock music or however one wishes to classify it as. My grandmother, who at the time was 76 actually surprised me by telling me she not only knew who he was, but that she had been to a Beatle concert back in 65 when they played in “Shea Stadium” (then home of the NY Jets and Mets and the place where I saw “The Rolling Stones” in concert in 1989) located in Queens in front of 66,000 people; this being the biggest rock concert at the time. After hearing about my grandmother’s experience if one could call it such with not only Lennon but “The Beatles”, I told her that John Lennon, had been shot though nothing else was known about it at the time. 

I can’t say that my grandmother was particularly grief stricken to hear the news though like myself, she never desired to hear that hurt had been caused to anybody so with her words of “I hope he does not die” I left her to go back to my room to continue watching Monday Night Football. As for the game, it actually ended in a draw, which given the rules of American football meant there would have to be sudden death overtime; and this was precisely what I was watching when Cossell announced that Lennon unfortunately had died from gunshot wounds received earlier that evening. It was then that I ran back to tell my grandmother, who I could see was saddened much in the way she had been when Elvis Presley died as her statement “It’s a shame, that people feel they have to do such things to one another” indicated.

As for myself, I naturally was saddened by this news but I must say not in a way that was different from any other time when I had heard of tragedy occurring; such as a plane crash or earthquake or something which had been responsible for the loss of life. Regarding the game itself; it finished with the Miami Dolphins winning in overtime. This making me feel just a little better since they were the team I was actually pulling for.

I can not say the death of Lennon personally meant much to me at the time since I practically knew nothing about him; not that it would have made any difference to me if I had since I am not one to mourn the deaths of those whom I do not know personally. As I had for instance the death of my own grandfather, who incidentally had also died in the month of December in the year of 1975. Lennon’s death however did help to augment my curiosity in learning about him much in the way Mercury’s death 11 years later increased my nephews curiosity to find out as much as he could about Queen.

I however will never forget the week that followed which in many ways reminded me of the time following Elvis Presley’s death; this given the fact that John Lennon’s demise was also all over the media, from the newspapers to the TV stations (though not CNN or MTV, as neither had gone on air yet) to the radio stations. It being a case where the last of these could not seem to get enough of playing his songs, weather as a solo artist or while still a member of “The Beatles”. It was songs such as “Imagine”, “Come Together”, “Starting Over” and many others which were among those played but I mention these in particular, given the reason that they were the only ones I knew even if I had been previously unaware that they were Lennon’s. “Starting Over” however stuck in my mind for another reason apart from it being the one that had been receiving heavy radio play in the time leading up to Lennon’s death, as it was the one my brother-in-law used to wake me one morning when I was sleeping over at his apartment. This I will never forget, it was early Saturday morning and I had spent the night sleeping on the sofa in my sister’s living room when all of a sudden I hear, the sound of bells. These bells literally blasting out of the stereo next to me, in what was the introduction to the song “Starting Over”. 

Actually during the months that lead up to Lennon’s death, I had been listening to the radio, just about everyday as I did my homework and found out that I actually enjoyed not only some of the songs, (some only after having heard them many times over) but even the commercials and general atmosphere of radio stations such as ABC and NBC. Regarding radio stations however I particularly recall two DJs by the names of Don Imus and Howard Stern, who caught my attention, specially since they did a morning show which was also promoted by a TV commercial showing people saying “I love “Imus in the morning” ”. It was also during this time that I for the first time in my life become familiar with some of the popular songs of the day such as “Another One Bites The Dust” (Queen), “I Love A Rainy Night” (Eddie Rabbit), “Emotional Rescue” (The Rolling Stones), “I Love You More Then I Can I Say” (Leo Sawyer) and many others. Therefore by the time of Lennon’s death I had become more familiar with pop music than I ever had which perhaps lead to me taking a bigger interest then I would have if it had happened before the fall of 1980 in which I received my first radio with a built in cassette player.  

With regards to TV stations, many took to playing films in which The Beatles had stared in such as “A Hard Day’s Night” and “Help” along with many a documentary about not only John Lennon’s music (both as a solo artist and a member of “The Beatles”) but his personal life. Much of it I noticed concentrated on his personal life, politics and what had been his marriage to Yoko Ono. There is one moment however in all the week that followed the death of John Lennon which will never leave my memory and it came on the first Saturday after his murder; when during the half time of a football game I was watching, the city of New York held a ten minute silence in Lennon’s honor. This being even more amazing when one takes in to consideration how when John Paul I died only 1 minute of silence was kept and not even by the whole city of New York. After all Popes, their will be many, even if one rather shaky theory says the world will end after a couple have died, but Lennon in his branch of music like Wagner in his will only be but once.

Looking back it is really incredible to think how John Lennon’s death in a way helped bring back popularity not only to The Beatles but that whole era that had been the first British invasion that brought along such bands as The Rolling Stones, The Kinks, and many others. It was as if rock and roll were being given a boost, as many people like myself who had not been either Lennon or Beatles fans suddenly become more interested in this sort of music. I for my part can imagine this is what occurred last year when Pavarotti died; that many people who unlike me were not opera fans for the short time that followed Pavarotti’s death became interested in opera. Perhaps even going out and getting a Pavarotti CD or DVD much like people did with Lennon, shortly after his death. Naturally at the time of Lennon’s death, there was neither of which as only albums and cassettes were available but I think most people who read this get my general meaning.

By the time of Lennon’s death, Rock and Roll however had had many death’s in its family which had gained publicity such as Brian Jones 69, Jimi Hendrix 70, Janis Joplin 70, Jim Morrison 71, Keith Moon 78 (who died in the same hotel room as Mama Cass), John Bonham 80, Bon Scot 80, Ellen Naomi Cohen 74 (a.k.a. Cass Eliot) but baring Elvis’s death none had received any where near the same amount of media attention. All of which making it clear what had been Lennon’s contribution to his gender of music which I must admit is not my favorite as I am one to follow classical music and opera though not to the extent that I am blinded to the quality of other different genders of music. This being the case though I am reminded of something I once heard some one say to Edward Van Halen (guitar player for the group that bears his last name) on MTV which was “music isn’t Rock and Roll or Heavy Metal or this kind or that kind but good or bad” only to have Van Halen reply “No, music isn’t good or bad, it’s something you like or don’t like”. This comment by Edward Van Halen being the way I see music as opposed to being good or bad, though I must say that I do like some of the music I heard in the field that is rock music that includes many others apart from The Beatles and Elvis Presley.

With regards to John Lennon’s death it really was not till Farrokh Bulsara (a.k.a. Freddie Mercury) died on November, 24 that any death in or out of music received so much of the media’s attention. This being the case with regards to media attention though perhaps a lot of the coverage received by Mercury was due to the fact that his death was caused by AIDS, which was an even bigger worry at the time then it is today. I for my own do remember feeling some sadness over the death of the “quiet Beatle” George Harrison, who died of Cancer on November 29, 2001, though news of his death was in part drowned out by the events of September. 11 which were still in the media.

The aftermath of Lennon’s death I would say brought about a return to rock music which had in recent years been cast aside perhaps by the “disco fever” that erupted after the film “Saturday Night Fever”. It was as if Lennon’s demise did for Rock and Roll what The Beatles had done for it so many years back in 1964, when they first appeared on the Ed Sullivan show. Rock and Roll was fashionable again and as for me? I can not in all honesty claim to have found in it what I have in classical music and opera ( I, being the author of the book “New York’s Opera Society”) though I did find something of value in it as I have with many other kinds of music. I could even say that it was that time period which followed Lennon’s death that inspired me to listen to many a variety of rock band and even attend concerts by Styx, AC/DC, Deep Purple, Rod Steward, Iron Maiden (on two occasions), Pearl Jam, David Lee Roth, Ian Gillan and The Rolling Stones.



Ruben

The Magic Of The Rolling Stones

January 24th, 2009
Victor Epand asked:


Unlike many other bands that had started out in the early sixties, the Rolling Stones is still going strong. In fact, because the band has been around for so long, many of the original band members are no longer with the Rolling Stones. When originally formed in the year of 1962, the band members consisted of Keith Richards, Mick Jagger, Brian Jones, Ian Stewart, Charlie Watts, and Bill Wyman. Brian Jones would be fired from the band in 1968 and Mick Taylor, who left the band in 1974, would take his place.

Ronnie Wood later joined the band and Bill Wyman left the band in the early nineties. Today, the band currently consists of only four members: Mick Jagger, Keith Richards, Ronnie Wood and Charlie Watts. Even with the many changes that occurred throughout the years, including the turn over in the members, the band continues to tour and be enjoyed for its music.

The Rolling Stones focused more in rhythm and blues and rock and roll when they first started out, but were more or less labeled a rock and roll band after a hit in the mid 1960s. From then, they went on to become one of the most successful rock and roll bands in the twentieth century. They would create thirty albums and many compilations through the years. In 1994, they made it into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

Even though they continued to tour and play together, many of the band members also created solo albums on the side. It is obvious through their dedication to their music and their want to continue playing that music is what these people love. For over forty years they have been playing together as a band and continuing to share their unique style with the world. In fact, they are quite experimental in their playing and have been extremely successful in doing so. Even though they are a rock and roll band, they always include many different music genres in their music.

Perhaps the reason why the Rolling Stones have been a success for so long is because they have such a passion and love for what they do. This is why they have been able to create music that has been enjoyed for more than forty years. It is an extraordinary achievement that other bands and musicians strive to do, and while there have been a few that were successful in having a lifetime career in music, there are few bands that have managed to entertain so well for so long.

The ironic thing about the band’s success is that in the beginning Mick Jagger and Keith Richards were not terribly impressed with their music and were surprised when their first few songs had such a good turn out. That success helped them to build their confidence and they kept on going after that. They may have underestimated their abilities at first, but after some hard work they began to see what they were really capable of.



Dennis

The Rolling Stones Still Going Strong In 2008

January 9th, 2009
Mike Shaw asked:


The Rolling Stones are one of the most successful bands ever. They originally formed in 1962 and are still touring forty-six years later. Mick Jagger and Keith Richards were among the original band members shortly followed by Bill Wyman and Charlie Watts.

Brian Jones and Ian Stewart originally formed the band. Mick Jagger joined at the beginning as their lead singer. Brian Jones died in 1969 by misadventure and Ian Stewart died of a heart attack in 1985.

Probably one of there most famous singles, which catapulted The Rolling Stones to stardom was there hit single in 1965 “I Can’t Get No Satisfaction”. Mick jagger and Keith Richards song writing partnership would ensure that they would sell upwards of 200 million albums.

Memorabilia and merchandise

With all this music history from The Rolling Stones, memorabilia and merchandise is plentiful. If you are a fan of The Rolling Stones, you will have no trouble finding posters, photos and original autographs of band members and compared to The Beatles memorabilia, it’s surprisingly cheap.

So what are the Rolling Stones up to in 2008?

They have just finished a film documentary directed by Martin Scorsese called “Shine a Light” about The Rolling Stones and starring The Rolling Stones with footage from their “A Bigger Bang” tour. The “A Bigger Bang” tour was a world tour and started in August 2005 and finished in August 2007. The tour is reported to have earned over 500 million dollars. Not bad for a bunch of pensioners.

In 2008 they also left the EMI recording company and signed with Universal Music which can only mean there are more Rolling Stones albums on the way and considering that Mick Jagger just turned 65 and Charlie Watts is 67 its makes you wonder where they get their motivation from, they certainly don’t need the money.

Is there really going to be a Rock & Roll band with members in their seventies. There’s only four more years to go before they can celebrate fifty years of the Rolling Stones. Mick Jagger has been quoted has saying he and the other band members have no intention of retiring and they want to make more albums and do more tours.

There is obviously still a great deal of interest in the Rolling Stones if the earning for the “A Bigger Bang” tour are anything to go by and I hope they carry on. As a musician myself I see them as a great inspiration. Being in a Rock & Roll band used to be a young mans game. Not any more.



Jose

The Rolling Stones Debut Album

January 8th, 2009
Mike Shaw asked:


The first Rolling Stones Album titled “The Rolling Stones” was released in the UK in 1964. The US version of this album was released a few months later with a different title; it was called “England’s Newest Hit Makers”.

Mick Jagger and Keith Richards have been the main songwriters for the Stones over the past forty years but in this, there first album they only wrote one of the tracks, called “Tell Me You’re Coming Back”. The other tracks were written by many top artists of the time.

Track List

1. “Route 66″ this song was written by Bobby Troup and is also know as “Get Your Kicks On Route 66

2. “I Just Want to Make Love to You” written by Willie Dixon in 1954 and has been recorded by many artist over the past fifty years

3. “Honest I Do” A blues number written by Jimmy Reed

4. “Mona I Need You Baby” written by Ellas McDaniel, later to be known as Bo Diddley

5. “Now I’ve Got a Witness Like Uncle Phil and Uncle Gene” written by Nanker Phelge

6. “Little by Little” written by Nanker Phelge and Phil Spector

7. “I’m a King Bee” written by James Moore also know as Slim Harpo

8. “Carol” written by Chuck Berry

9. “Tell Me You’re Coming Back” written by Mick Jagger and Keith Richards

10. “Can I Get a Witness” written by Brian Holland, Lamont Dozier, Eddie Holland

11. “You Can Make It If You Try” Ted Jarrett

12. “Walking the Dog” written by Rufus Thomas and covered by many popular artists

There first album was an instant success, reaching No 1 in the UK Top 20 Album charts and No 4 in the Billboard Pop Album charts.

Many of the tracks on this album were drawn from there first UK tour in 1963. On this tour, they were a supporting act to a number of American R&B acts, which was a great learning curve for the future song writing team of Mick Jagger and Keith Richards.

Prior to the tour the Stones had released two singles, their first debut single was a Chuck Berry song called “Come On” released in 1963 and there second single, written by John Lennon and Paul McCartney called “I Wanna Be Your Man” was released in the same year. The Beatles also recorded this song, but in Beatles style of course, good old Rock&Roll. The Stones version was a Blues version. Both the Rolling Stones singles did very well and hit the UK top twenty charts.



Harvey

A Comprehensive List of Food Safety Tips

January 5th, 2009
Josh Stone asked:


Whether you have a career in food preparation, entertain privately, or just cook for your family, food handling has some science to it that you should know. What with hearing a story in the news every other day about yet another Salmonella or E. Coli outbreak, we could all stand to hear a refresher course in the sanitary preparing of food.

Handling food

Wash and dry hands thoroughly before handling food. Always use clean kitchen utensils for handling foods. Keep raw and cooked food apart at all times. Apply this especially to raw meat, fish, and poultry. Keep these away from cooked foods and ready-to-eat foods. Wash and dry hands, utensils, cutting boards, knives, and flat surfaces thoroughly after preparing raw meat, fish, poultry and other raw foods and before contact with other food. Ideally you should use separate cutting boards for raw and cooked foods. Never put cooked food onto a plate which has previously held these raw foods until it has been washed. Do not use the same utensil to stir or serve a cooked meal that was used to prepare the raw ingredients.

Vegetables of the root family such as potatoes, leeks and carrots often have traces of soil on them which can contain harmful bacteria, so wash them thoroughly before use. As a rule you should wash other fruit and vegetables too, especially if they are going to be eaten raw. Avoid preparing food for yourself or others if you are sick.

Defrosting

When cooking packaged frozen foods always follow instructions provided for defrosting or cooking directly from frozen. If cooking from frozen allow sufficient time for food to be thoroughly cooked and check it before serving; an extra minute in the fryer won’t hurt it. When defrosting foods make sure they are fully defrosted before cooking; being sure to allow food enough time to thaw. Never re-freeze food once it has started to thaw.

Thaw food by placing it on the bottom shelf of the fridge in a container to catch any juices, or in a bin or rack over a sink. These juices will often be contaminated so wash dishes and hands thoroughly after use. Only thaw food in a microwave oven if it is to be cooked immediately. To thaw very large meat items like turkeys, leg of lamb, etc. more quickly, let them defrost outside of the fridge. Put them in a cool place and make sure they are completely thawed before cooking.

Cooking and heating

Follow recipes and label instructions on cooking times and temperatures.

Remember to preheat the oven properly – the instructions for preheating take into account that the cooking time should be at the full temperature. Cook all foods until they are piping hot. Remember that sausages, burgers, pork and poultry are cooked all the way through and they should not be rare or pink in the middle. As a test, pierce it with a knife; any juices that run out of the meat should be clear, not bloody. Lamb and beef (except when minced or rolled) can be eaten rare, but you should make sure the outer surface is thoroughly cooked to kill any germs on the surface of the meat.

Elderly or sick people, babies, young children and pregnant women should only eat eggs cooked until both yolk and white are solid and should never eat raw or partially cooked seafood. Don’t cook foods too far in advance. Once cooked, foods should be kept covered and piping hot (above 145F) until it’s time to serve them. Keep prepared cold foods in the fridge until you are ready to serve them.

When using a microwave, stir foods and drinks and allow them to stand for a couple of minutes to avoid hot or cold spots. Check that food is hot throughout before serving. Foods that are not thoroughly cooked should be re-heated for another few minutes, but when it comes to microwaves food should not be reheated more than twice.

Cooling

Never put hot food directly into the fridge or freezer, let it cool sufficiently first. Cooling should be completed within one or two hours after cooking. To speed cooling you can divide foods into smaller portions, place in a wide dish and stand this in a shallow tray of cold water.

Extra care for babies

Because babies’ immune systems are less developed than those of an adult, they are at a greater risk of illness. To take extra care for young babies, wash bottles and utensils in hot soapy water and sterilize them using a sterilizing solution or a steam sterilizer. When adding water to baby foods, milks and other drinks always use bottled water and never water straight from the sink tap. Cook foods thoroughly until piping hot and cool them rapidly until they are comfortable to eat.

Extra care with barbecues and grills

Cooking food outdoors, particularly for large groups, can increase the risk of food poisoning. It’s harder to keep foods very hot or very cold and to keep everything clean. But with a little extra care barbecues and outdoor grills can be used safely.

Light the barbecue well in advance, making sure that you use enough charcoal and wait until it is glowing red with a powdery gray surface before starting to cook. Keep meats, salads and other perishable food in the fridge, or in an ice-packed portable cooler box, until just before you are ready to cook them. Serve salads at the last minute. Ideally use separate cooler boxes for raw meats and ready-to-eat foods. Cooler boxes can only keep food cool for a limited period so cook sooner rather than later. Better still,

if possible, fully pre-cook all poultry and sausages in an indoor kitchen and then take them straight to the barbecue to add the final barbecue flavor.

During cooking, turn food often. If it starts to burn on the outside raise the grill height or reduce the heat of the charcoal. You reduce charcoal’s heat by dampening the coals slightly or partially closing the air vents. As always, cook poultry, burgers, pork and sausages throughout with no pink bits in the middle. Keep raw and cooked foods apart at all times.

Don’t handle cooked foods with utensils that have touched raw meats and don’t put cooked or ready-to-eat foods such as salad and bread on plates that have held raw meats.



Alexander

Led Zeppelin is the #1 Rock and Roll Band of All Time

December 29th, 2008
Peter Cross asked:


I’ve been in rock and roll all my life and I’m well aware that The Rolling Stones have been called the best rock and roll band. Don’t get me wrong because I love Mick and the Stones, and the Beatles were my major musical influence, but here’s why I think that Led Zeppelin is the best rock and roll band of all time:

1. BEST PLAYERS

First of all, John Bonham was the best rock and roll drummer ever to walk the face of this planet, and that’s an informed opinion coming from a former professional drummer. John played drums unlike anyone else ever did, still does, or ever will, and that fact is continually demonstrated in the astounding breadth and depth of his recorded work. He had complete independence in all four limbs, he slammed his drums harder than anyone else, and he did it with speed and total precision, never once dropping the beat. His beats were innovative and creative, and John was never stuck in simple grooves. His fills were innovative, creative, complex, and technically brilliant, he knew when to keep it relatively simple (i.e. Kashmir), but he was always in the stratosphere of drumming. And to top that all off, John created a giant drum sound which is unique. It inspired a host of imitators who were able to imitate the sound of his snare drum, but only with a simple backbeat. At the time that Led Zep was formed, Jimmy Page could have gotten any drummer in the world to play with him, and he chose John. There’s not one single drummer alive or dead who can begin to touch John’s power, creativity, speed, precision, and technical brilliance. I’ve heard that Jimmy still feels the same way about John as I do.

Secondly, Jimmy Page has always been one of the best rock guitarists ever, right from his earliest days as a session player and the beginning of his real public stardom in the Yardbirds. I suspect that Jimmy would agree with me that Jimi Hendrix was the one true genius of guitar because he came from another galaxy in terms of his sound and his use of feedback. But unfortunately, Jimi died and we will never know how much further he would have progressed. When I listen to Jimmy’s solos using the violin bow, I get the urge to put him on the same pedestal as Hendrix and wonder which galaxy they both came from. As a songwriter, Jimmy used his superior ability to play lead guitar to create actual song structure. Led Zep’s songs use not one or two of Jimmy’s incredibly powerful, complicated and unbelievably **** riffs in each song, but there are four, five or more riffs in some songs. Jimmy’s riffs differ from each other within each song, and also from song to song. His lead guitar playing can be HARD and sexy, he can be sensitive and beautiful, and he can be technically brilliant, all in the very same song.

Thirdly, John Paul Jones is a bass player who attained a level of brilliance comparable to Paul McCartney. Just like McCartney, John could play beautiful “melodic” bass (i.e. “Ramble On”), he could play as fast as it gets, but he also knew when to keep it simple and just hold down the bottom although I think he was incapable of doing that without utter sophistication. No one at all can touch those two on bass, and John also played consistently brilliant keyboards - piano, organ and synthesizer. The intricate way in which he wove his bass guitar playing into, through, and underneath Jimmy’s guitar playing is nothing short of perfection itself.

And last but not at all least, Robert Plant had an incredibly high vocal range, emotionally as well as in terms of octaves. Just like Dylan was for his own music, Robert’s voice was perfect for Led Zep’s music and there’s no other singer who could possibly have fit in. As a professional singer, I’m knocked out by Robert’s vocals on both a technical and an emotional level. Robert understood the concept of using his voice like a musical instrument, creating fascinating sounds without using lyrics. And Robert co-wrote with Jimmy too. A lot of the time you can’t understand his lyrics and I’ve heard that was Robert’s intent because just like Mick Jagger, all he cared about at that time was that you connect with the emotion and the energy in the totality of the music. But when you can get the lyrics (like in Stairway to Heaven, their tribute to Janis Joplin), you find a great piece of poetry. And on top of all that, Robert had the best “oooh yeahs” in the business!

2.CREATIVE SONGWRITING

Hardly anybody has ever covered Led Zep songs for very good reasons. Their song structure is based on their vastly superior playing abilities and there’s no one who can actually play what they played. I’m talking about songs that are not based on simple chords like all other rock and roll is. Jimmy and Robert based their songs on Jimmy’s riffs and on his chordal tonalities that to this day stand alone as being unique. I’m also talking about length of songs that maintain a constant and intense high, up to 11 minutes in length without resorting to an overly repetitive chorus. I know from Robert’s solo work after Led Zep that he also uses unusual tonalities in his writing, but even without actually knowing this I would have to assume that due to Jimmy Page being an erupting fountain of brilliant guitar work, the majority of the non-vocal music creation came from Jimmy. The Beatles certainly deserve abject worship for John and Paul’s creative songwriting ability, no question about that. Certainly Mick and Keith wrote a slew of classic, historic and truly memorable rock songs, but the very nature of their comparatively simple rock and roll structure and basic similarity to each other in terms of using major and minor chord progressions, simple and basic rock and roll rhythms, and verse/chorus/bridge approach defines them as being less innovative when compared to Robert and Jimmy.

3.SUM TOTAL OF BRILLIANT WORK

Here they outdistance The Stones because most of the Stones’ albums have “fillers”, which are songs that do not hit the same intense high that got slammed in all their best ones. However, I’d like to say that I don’t think either Mick or Robert is capable of recording anything short of a brilliant vocal. The Beatles actually exceed Led Zep in terms of numbers of great albums that constitute a greater body of brilliant and uniquely innovative work that literally broke new musical ground with every single song they recorded. The Beatles were simply The Beatles, and they were the most creative rock and roll band ever, from being the best singers and songwriters ever right down to their individual charm and charisma. But without denigrating their gorgeous, sensitive and original style of playing, what they recorded is not the heavy type of rock and roll that either the Stones or Led Zep played. George, Paul and John were all brilliant and creative guitarists, but because they did not improvise on stage, they were not really master guitarists. I love and respect Ringo as both a person and as a very creative drummer who mastered the art of drum sounds. He has his own unmistakable Ringo style for both, but he’s not really a master drummer in the sense of being able to play with great speed and dexterity. I’m talking about 9 Led Zep albums chock full of brilliant and intensely high songs - I don’t know how many hours of great rock and roll listening that is. There’s not a single weak track among all that work, and there’s simply no question that they consistently broke new ground musically. Their debut album is still the best one of all time (including Cream’s), and Coda, their “swan song” is equally perfect.

4.STAGE PRESENCE

Led Zep was there when the concept of rock and roll star” was still evolving. I will grant that the Stones at least deserve honorable mention as the best rock and roll band but it’s mostly because of their impressive touring record and Mick’s superstar stage presence with his ability to put on a great show every single time he appears. And he’s still doing it at age 60 for goodness sake! My point isn’t that Led Zep necessarily had the best stage presence, just that they did have a true rock star sexual aura.

I could go on about Jimmy Page’s abilities as a producer, and there are other aspects to their greatness like the length of time they were together without a change of band members. And the life they actually led as archtypical wild rock and roll bad boys equals the life led by the Rolling Stones in intensity, if not length. Both bands are perfect examples on an artistic level of what I call FORM = CONTENT, which in this case means that these two rock and roll bands personified the rock and roll life.

In conclusion, the above four categories do enough to fully qualify Led Zeppelin for my not-so-humble award. There will never be another rock and roll band to approach the stratospheric musical heights that Led Zep reached. The Recording Industry Association of America, who has the correct statistics, lists Led Zeppelin as the third best selling musical act/artist in history. The Beatles are first, with 166.5 million albums sold in the USA alone, Elvis is second with 117.5 million, and Led Zep is third with 106 million. I think it’s very significant that those statistics are becoming geometrically times greater than the number of albums that they sold during their performance lifetimes. What has happened and is happening is that the young people of today are discovering them in droves because they are coming of age sexually and they recognize and connect with the most powerful musical example of that sexual power. They are buying their CD’s, shirts, posters and other memorabilia. And frankly, I’m thrilled.



Jamie

Casino Career A Reference Guide

December 28th, 2008
Josh Stone asked:


A little guide to the hospitality industry’s most flashy little subculture. Casinos have had their own little universe of jargon since their first origins. Use this as a clip ‘n’ save reference.

All In - When a player has bet all of their remaining chips.

Ante - The opening bet placed into the pot by all players of a poker round.

Bad Beat - When one very high hand is beaten by an even higher one in poker.

Banker - The dealer covering the action of the other bettors in Baccarat.

Bankroll - The player’s total available gambling money.

Betting Limits - The maximum and minimum allowable bets, to discourage Martingale systems.

Bingo Bus - A tour bus arriving with a group of tourists, usually retirees, to a casino for the day.

Blind Bet - A bet that certain poker players are required to make because of their betting order.

Bluff - Pretending to have a better poker hand in the hopes that other players will fold.

Board - The center of a poker table where the community cards are dealt face-up.

Book - The place where you place bets on sporting events; the Race and Sports Book.

Breaker - A new dealer brought in to break a player’s lucky streak.

Break-In House - A dealer’s first job, typically their learning period at a lower-standards casino.

Bring-In - a mandatory bet by the player with the lowest upcard in the first round of 7-card stud..

Bust - Going over 21 in blackjack.

Bust Out - To make a player go broke.

Burned card - The top card immediately discarded in blackjack, done to ensure a fair game.

Button - The marker that designated the dealer between rounds in poker.

Cage - The cashier’s booth.

Call - To respond to a raised bet with a matching bet in poker.

Check - When a poker player opts to stay in the game without raising the bet.

Checks - Another word for casino chips.

Comp - Any free benefit provided to guests and players, such as free food and drink.

Comp Card - An electronic card similar to a credit card used to track comp points.

Comp Points - A loyalty scheme which rewards players with comp points for playing.

Copy - When a player and the banker have the same hand In Pai Gow poker.

Croupier - The French term for dealer, used in the games of baccarat and roulette.

Cut - Cutting the deck of cards and replacing them with their hands inverted after shuffling.

Die - The singular form of the word ‘dice’.

Discard - A tray on the dealers right side that holds all previously played cards.

Double Down - In blackjack, to double your bet and split it into two hands to play at once.

Draw - To receive a new round of cards.

Drop - Lose money at a game.

EO - The privilege of going home from work early, known as ‘Early-Out’.

Even Money - A bet that pays you back in the ratio of 1 to 1, for example ‘odds’ bets in craps.

Fifth Street - The third round of betting in seven-card stud, when all players have five cards.

Flop - The three cards dealt face-up in the center of the table in Texas Hold-Em.

Flush - A hand consisting of five cards of one suit in poker.

Fold - When a poker player declines to bet and drops out of the hand.

Foreign Coin - Chips or tokens from another casino.

Foul - When the two-card low hand is set higher than the five-card high hand in Pai Gow poker.

Four Of A Kind - Four cards of the same rank in poker.

Fourth Street - The second round of betting in seven-card stud, when all players have four cards.Full House - A hand consisting of a three of a kind and a pair in poker.

Hit - To accept another card in blackjack.

Hole Card - The face-down card that the dealer gets in blackjack.

House Edge - The percentage of profit from each bet that the casino makes; the casino’s profit.

Inside Bet - A roulette bet placed on any small combination of numbers, as opposed to a group.

Insurance - In blackjack, a side bet that the dealer has a natural if the dealer is showing an ace.

Kicker - An odd high card in poker not part of a combination, used to decide draws.

Marker - A check written by a player at the table if they have established credit with the casino.

Muck - The act of throwing your cards away because you cannot or did not win the pot in poker.

Natural - In blackjack, a natural is a two-card hand of twenty-one points.

Open - The first player to bet in a round of poker.

Outside Bets - Roulette bets located on the outside part of the layout, including a large range.

Pair - Any two cards of the same rank in poker.

Pass - To make either a 7-11 on the come-out or to roll the point before the seven in craps.

Payline - The line on a slot machine window on which the symbols from each reel must line up.

Payout Percentage - The percentage which a slot machine pays back per dollar bet.

Pit Boss - The person who supervises the table gaming area.

Pocket - Your first two down cards in Texas Hold-Em.

Pot - the accumulated bets in a round of poker, payable to the winning hand.

Progressive - A slot machine whose potential jackpot increases with each coin that is played.

Push - A tie hand between a dealer and a player in blackjack.

Qualifier - A poker hand which meets the minimum standard to bet.

Raise - A bet to increase the stakes in poker.

Rake - The money that the casino charges for each hand of poker.

River - The final card dealt in a hand of 7-card stud or Texas Hold-Em.

Rock - An extremely conservative player, who bets low, folds early, takes the best odds, etc.

Royal Flush - An ace-high straight flush in poker, the best possible hand.

Session - A series of plays at any gambling game.

Set - Two separate hands of two and five cards each in Pai-Gow poker.

Shoe - A plastic rack designed to hold several decks of cards in dealing table games.

Showdown - When all the cards are revealed at the end of betting in a poker round.

Side Action - The table games with a huge house edge, said to be only played by ’suckers’.

Soft Hand - Any hand that contains an ace counted as eleven in blackjack.

Stand - To refrain from taking another card in blackjack, ending the player’s turn.

Straight - A hand consisting of five cards of consecutive ranks in poker.

Straight Flush - A straight in poker where the cards are also of the same suit, but not a Royal.

Surrender - To throw away your hand in blackjack.

Three of a Kind - Three cards of the same value in poker.

Tokes - Another word for tips, those paid to dealers.

Two Pair - Two pairs of cards with the same value in poker.



Herman